INDEX FINGER POSITION AND FORCE OF THE HUMAN FIRST DORSAL INTEROSSEUSAND ITS ULNAR NERVE ANTAGONIST

Citation
I. Zijdewind et D. Kernell, INDEX FINGER POSITION AND FORCE OF THE HUMAN FIRST DORSAL INTEROSSEUSAND ITS ULNAR NERVE ANTAGONIST, Journal of applied physiology, 77(2), 1994, pp. 987-997
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Physiology
ISSN journal
87507587
Volume
77
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
987 - 997
Database
ISI
SICI code
8750-7587(1994)77:2<987:IFPAFO>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
In normal subjects, maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) and electrical ulnar nerve stimulation (UNS; 30-Hz bursts of 0.33 s) were systematic ally compared with regard to the forces generated in different directi ons (abduction/adduction and flexion) and at different degrees of inde x finger abduction. With a ''resting'' hand position in which there wa s no index finger abduction, UNS produced about one-half of the abduct ion force elicited by an MVC (mean ratio 51%). Qualitatively, such a d iscrepancy would be expected, because UNS activates two index finger m uscles with opposing actions in the abduction/adduction plane of torqu es: the first dorsal interosseus (FDI) and the first palmar interosseu s (FPI). The abduction forces produced by MVC and UNS were very sensit ive to index finger abduction angle: at a maximum degree of abduction, the UNS-generated force even reversed its direction of action to addu ction (with FPI dominating) and the abduction MVC declined to 37% of t hat in the resting hand position. Inasmuch as these declines in MVC- a nd UNS-generated abduction force could not be explained by a change in moment arm, the main alternative seemed to be abduction-associated al terations in FDI fiber length (analysis by previously published biomec hanical data). The FDI and PPI were further compared by application of a UNS-generated fatigue test (5-min burst stimulation), with the inde x finger kept at a ''neutral'' angle, i.e., the abduction angle at whi ch, in the unfatigued state, the forces of the FDI and FPI were in bal ance (zero net UNS-generated abduction/adduction force). There was no major difference in the fatigability of the two muscles, yet the fatig ue reactions of the two muscles were not fully identical.