I. Zijdewind et D. Kernell, INDEX FINGER POSITION AND FORCE OF THE HUMAN FIRST DORSAL INTEROSSEUSAND ITS ULNAR NERVE ANTAGONIST, Journal of applied physiology, 77(2), 1994, pp. 987-997
In normal subjects, maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) and electrical
ulnar nerve stimulation (UNS; 30-Hz bursts of 0.33 s) were systematic
ally compared with regard to the forces generated in different directi
ons (abduction/adduction and flexion) and at different degrees of inde
x finger abduction. With a ''resting'' hand position in which there wa
s no index finger abduction, UNS produced about one-half of the abduct
ion force elicited by an MVC (mean ratio 51%). Qualitatively, such a d
iscrepancy would be expected, because UNS activates two index finger m
uscles with opposing actions in the abduction/adduction plane of torqu
es: the first dorsal interosseus (FDI) and the first palmar interosseu
s (FPI). The abduction forces produced by MVC and UNS were very sensit
ive to index finger abduction angle: at a maximum degree of abduction,
the UNS-generated force even reversed its direction of action to addu
ction (with FPI dominating) and the abduction MVC declined to 37% of t
hat in the resting hand position. Inasmuch as these declines in MVC- a
nd UNS-generated abduction force could not be explained by a change in
moment arm, the main alternative seemed to be abduction-associated al
terations in FDI fiber length (analysis by previously published biomec
hanical data). The FDI and PPI were further compared by application of
a UNS-generated fatigue test (5-min burst stimulation), with the inde
x finger kept at a ''neutral'' angle, i.e., the abduction angle at whi
ch, in the unfatigued state, the forces of the FDI and FPI were in bal
ance (zero net UNS-generated abduction/adduction force). There was no
major difference in the fatigability of the two muscles, yet the fatig
ue reactions of the two muscles were not fully identical.