COMPLIANCE WITH AND TOLERANCE OF MEFLOQUINE AND CHLOROQUINE PLUS PROGUANIL MALARIA CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS IN FRENCH SHORT-TERM TRAVELERS TO SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA
B. Carme et al., COMPLIANCE WITH AND TOLERANCE OF MEFLOQUINE AND CHLOROQUINE PLUS PROGUANIL MALARIA CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS IN FRENCH SHORT-TERM TRAVELERS TO SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA, TM & IH. Tropical medicine & international health, 2(10), 1997, pp. 953-956
To compare the compliance with and tolerance of mefloquine (MQ) and ch
loroquine + proguanil (CQ-PRO) chemoprophylaxis, we conducted a study
using a self-reported questionnaire in 2 groups of native French adult
Visitors to Senegal or Kenya. CQ (100 mg dairy) + PRO (200 mg daily)
prophylaxis was prescribed for all patients travelling to Senegal and
for those going to Kenya when MQ was contraindicated; MQ (250 mg weekl
y) was prescribed for the other subjects. There were no significant di
fferences in age, sex, exposition and measures of protection against m
osquito bites, concomitant drug use or mean duration of chemoprophylax
is between the 2 groups, and compliance during travel was excellent in
both. Chemoprophylaxis was more frequently interrupted prematurely in
the MQ group. The rates of overall side-effects attributed to malaria
chemoprophylaxis were 16% for MQ against 12% for CQ-PRO (not signific
ant). However, nonserious neuropsychiatric adverse events are more fre
quent with MQ: 11.5% compared to 2% with CQ-PRO. MQ should be used wit
h caution.