This paper examines tense, aspect, and voice choices in the reporting
verbs in a corpus of research articles from the Journal of Psychosomat
ic Medicine. The study also investigates how such choices correlate wi
th other syntactic elements (e.g., subject) in the citations, as well
as with the discourse functions of the citations in their contexts. Th
e findings are that the main choices for the verb in reporting sentenc
es in the data are the past tense (mainly in the active form with a fe
w passives), the present tense, and the present perfect (active and pa
ssive). We also note particular features such as syntactic structure a
ssociated with the citations using the three tenses. Tense choices are
seen to correlate with a categorization of reporting verbs into disco
urse and non-discourse verbs. Finally, the discourse functions of the
citations with these tense choices are described. Citations with past
tense verbs and named researchers as subject seem to have the discours
e role of providing particulars for a preceding generalization or the
basis for a claim. Citations with present tense verbs generally have t
he discourse function of communicating generalized interpretations/con
clusions and also suggest writer commitment to the reported informatio
n. Present perfect tense in citations serves to highlight the direct r
elevance of previous studies to the reporting writer's own research wr
ite-up.