SCISSORS OR HORIZON - NEOCLASSICAL DEBATES ABOUT RETURNS TO SCALE, COSTS, AND LONG-RUN SUPPLY, 1926-1942

Citation
N. Aslanbeigui et Mi. Naples, SCISSORS OR HORIZON - NEOCLASSICAL DEBATES ABOUT RETURNS TO SCALE, COSTS, AND LONG-RUN SUPPLY, 1926-1942, Southern economic journal, 64(2), 1997, pp. 517-530
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Economics
Journal title
ISSN journal
00384038
Volume
64
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
517 - 530
Database
ISI
SICI code
0038-4038(1997)64:2<517:SOH-ND>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Modern treatment of long-run (U-shaped) cost curves developed from rea ctions to Sraffa's criticisms of Marshall. He argued that internal (di s)economies were incompatible with partial-equilibrium analysis under perfect competition. Pigou concurred and drew L-shaped cost curves; Vi ner realized that this made firm size indeterminate and industry outpu t volatile. Using Austin and Joan Robinson's analyses, Stigler justifi ed rising costs/supply, determinacy, and stability by irrational entre preneurs enduring coordination failure and by factor price changes. We conclude that consistency requires constant costs but firm employment , output, and factor incomes remain theoretically indeterminate. It be comes likely that large firms will undermine perfect competition.