S. Issacharoff et Ew. Harris, IS AGE-DISCRIMINATION REALLY AGE-DISCRIMINATION - THE ADEAS UNNATURALSOLUTION, New York University law review, 72(4), 1997, pp. 780-840
Through a series of reforms over the last two decades, the Age Discrim
ination in Employment Act (ADEA) has become the most far-reaching of t
he antidiscrimination statutes. In this Article, Professor Issacharoff
and Ms. Harris provide a critical reexamination of both the ADEA itse
lf and more generally, the use of antidiscrimination law to address th
e problem of aging in employment The authors distinguish the disadvant
ages that older employees face from classic claims of employment discr
imination, noting the inapplicability of the antidiscrimination model
underlying the ADEA to some of the problems associated with aging in e
mployment The authors then turn to the development of the ADEA and its
amendments, examining the role of regulatory capture in the expansion
of ADEA protections. They conclude that the broad use of antidiscrimi
nation law to address the problem of aging in employment without accou
nting for the differences between classic claims of discrimination and
the particular problems faced by older employees has resulted in a dr
amatic and unjustified shift in wealth toward older Americans. Accordi
ngly, they propose a series of reforms designed to address both the sp
ecific problems faced by older employees and the reallocation of wealt
h imposed by recent ADEA amendments.