C. Doliveira et al., INDUCTION OF PROTECTIVE IMMUNITY TO THEILERIA-ANNULATA USING 2 MAJOR MEROZITE SURFACE-ANTIGENS PRESENTED BY DIFFERENT DELIVERY SYSTEMS, Vaccine, 15(16), 1997, pp. 1796-1804
Allelic forms (Tams1-1 and Tams1-2) of the major merozoite surface ant
igen gene of Theileria annulata have recently been expressed in Escher
ichia coli and in Salmonella typhimurium aroA vaccine strain SL3261. T
o test the potential of subunit vaccines against T. annulata infection
, we immunized four groups of three calves with either recombinant (re
-) (Tams1-1 and Tams1-2) proteins or naked DNA encoding these antigens
. Group I was immunized intramuscularly with both re-proteins incorpor
ated into immunostimulating complexes (ISCOMs). Group II was inoculate
d intramuscularly with naked plasmid DNA encoding Tams1-1 and Tams1-2
Groups III and IV received S. typhimurium SL3261 [pSTams1-1][pIP5] and
SL3261 [pSTams1-2][pIP5] subcutaneously and orally, respectively. A f
inal group of three animals (Group V) served as an unimmunized control
group. Four weeks after the last immunization all calves were challen
ged with a T. annulata stabilate generated from blood of an infected a
nimal with 30% piroplasm parasitaemia. All calves vaccinated with ISCO
Ms proved to be protected from T. annulata infection and had generated
antibodies against both re-(Tams1-1 and Tams1-2) at the time of chall
enge. In two of these animals the antibody had a surface binding profi
le by IFAT. Two of three calves immunized with naked DNA also proved t
o be protected, but none of the animals had generated any detectable a
ntibodies against the recombinants. Salmonella-based delivery of the r
ecombinants did not induce any protection; two of six animals died of
theileriosis and there was no difference between subcutaneous or oral
administration. These preliminary results show that re-(Tams1-1 and/or
Tams1-2) may elicit protective immune responses in cattle, depending
on the antigen delivery system. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.