NEGLECT AS A DEFICIT DETERMINED BY AN IMBALANCE BETWEEN MULTIPLE SPATIAL REPRESENTATIONS

Citation
E. Ladavas et al., NEGLECT AS A DEFICIT DETERMINED BY AN IMBALANCE BETWEEN MULTIPLE SPATIAL REPRESENTATIONS, Experimental Brain Research, 116(3), 1997, pp. 493-500
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
00144819
Volume
116
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
493 - 500
Database
ISI
SICI code
0014-4819(1997)116:3<493:NAADDB>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
A previous study on neglect suggested that at least two hand parameter s are crucial in producing an amelioration of neglect: the hand (left or right) and the spatial position of the hand (left or right). The im provement observed in perceiving left targets when the left hand acts in the left space can be due either to proprioceptive or to visual cui ng. The stimulated left hand located in the left space may act as a po werful visual cue for the enhancement of the left visuo-spatial repres entation, in the same way as any other visual stimulus presented in th e periphery of the visual field. Alternatively, it may be that the per ceived hand location (due to the activation of the proprioceptive syst em) acts as an attentional field able to enhance the representation of the left space. In order to disentangle these two hypotheses, in the present study a naming task was executed by a group of neglect patient s and by a control group. The subjects had to name all the objects dep icted on a sheet of paper which were reflected on a mirror that invert ed right and left space. While doing the naming performance, the subje cts passively moved either the right or the left hand, in the left or right space. Stimuli and hand were reflected in the mirror that invert ed right and left space and direct view of the stimuli and of the stim ulated hand was prevented by a board. The results show that patients w ere more accurate at naming stimuli reflected in the left side of the mirror when the left hand was located and moved on the left side. In t his condition, however, the left hand was seen in the right side of th e mirror. It is therefore clear that the better performance was not du e to visuo-spatial cuing but to a proprioceptive cuing effect. The res ults are discussed in terms of the relevance of personal and periperso nal spatial activation in the modulation of extrapersonal visual negle ct. The coactivation of different spatial representations seems to be very influential on stimulus coding, thus confirming that spatial awar eness is strictly related to the joint activity of multiple brain maps .