Differences in attribution complexity affect the degree to which indiv
iduals vary their causal processing in response to a variety of experi
mental manipulations (Fletcher, Danilovics, Fernandez, Peterson, & Ree
der, 1986) We predicted that manipulating people's psychological persp
ectives tie., actor versus observer) would produce divergent casual ju
dgments as in past research. Individual attribution complexity was exp
ected to interact with perspective to magnify actor-observer divergenc
e. Psychological perspective was altered by having participants recall
naturalistic interactions about unfulfilled obligations that they wer
e involved in as either the message source (observer) or the target(ac
tor). Differences in attribution complexity did moderate people's susc
eptibility to actor-observer bias. Attributionally complex, but not si
mple, participants varied the degree to which they attributed unfulfil
led obligations primarily to the message target (actor), and discounte
d external circumstances, depending on the perspectives from which the
y recalled tile obligation situations. Explanations and implications o
f this finding are considered.