A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING CONTINUOUS BLADDER DRAINAGEWITH CATHETERIZATION AT ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY

Citation
Sp. Dobbs et al., A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING CONTINUOUS BLADDER DRAINAGEWITH CATHETERIZATION AT ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY, British Journal of Urology, 80(4), 1997, pp. 554-556
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00071331
Volume
80
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
554 - 556
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-1331(1997)80:4<554:APRTCC>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Objective To compare the infection rate and postoperative morbidity be tween in-dwelling urinary catheterization and 'in-out' catheterization at the time of routine total abdominal hysterectomy. Patients and met hods The study comprised 100 patients who were blindly randomized to h ave either an indwelling Foley catheter or an 'in-out' catheterization at the time of surgery. Follow-up data on the retention of urine, uri nary symptoms and infection were obtained. Results Of the 95 patients with complete data, 36% of those undergoing in-out catheterization had urinary retention after operation, requiring bladder emptying, compar ed with 4% of those receiving an indwelling catheter (P<0,001). In add ition, 29% of the catheterized group had urinary tract bacteriuria com pared with 13% of the uncatheterized group (P<0.025), Conclusion This randomized controlled trial showed that in-out urinary catheterization at the time of routine abdominal hysterectomy was associated with a s ignificantly higher incidence of post-operative urinary retention comp ared with in-dwelling catheterization, and may have implications for l ong-term bladder function.