P. Weiden et W. Glazer, ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT SELECTION FOR REVOLVING-DOOR INPATIENTS WITHSCHIZOPHRENIA, Psychiatric quarterly, 68(4), 1997, pp. 377-392
Goals: The goals of this study are 1) to determine causes and patterns
of relapse for a cohort of ''revolving door'' schizophrenia inpatient
s, and 2) to assess the feasibility of starting a new psychopharmacolo
gic intervention before discharge, either depot therapy or an atypical
antipsychotic. Methods: Consecutive admissions to an acute inpatient
unit in New York City were screened for ''revolving door'' criteria. P
atients had to have a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffe
ctive disorder and have either I) two hospitalizations in the last yea
r, or 2) three hospitalizations in the last three years. Patients were
then assessed for probable causes of relapse for the index and prior
two hospitalizations. Treatment selection, based on this information,
was trichotomized to: 1) oral conventional antipsychotic, 2) depot con
ventional antipsychotic (either haloperidol or fluphenazine decanoate)
, or 3) atypical antipsychotic (either risperidone or clozapine). Resu
lts: Sixty-three out of 131 screened admissions met the above revolvin
g door criteria. They were indeed ''revolving'', having an average of
1.3 hospitalizations per year over the last 3 years and were only out
of the hospital for five months (median) before index admission. The t
reatment selection process was hampered by lack of information about e
vents leading to relapse, and by the lack of outpatient participation
in the medication selection process. Of the 50 patients with complete
histories about precipitants for the index episode, the most common re
ason for rehospitalization was judged to be medication noncompliance (
n = 25; 50%), followed by medication nonresponse (n = 13; 26%). Not su
rprisingly, medication recommendations were closely linked to the asse
ssed reason for relapse (depot therapy [n = 27; 49%] with medication n
on-compliance; atypical antipsychotic [n = 20; 37%] with medication no
nresponse [X-2 = 26.9, p<.001]). These two recommendations were implem
ented before discharge for about one-half of the cases. Patient refusa
l was a relatively greater problem for depot recommendation while cons
traints in the outpatient environment were more problematic for patien
ts recommended for atypical antipsychotics. Conclusions: Medication no
ncompliance and medication nonresponse, in that order, were judged to
be the most common causes of relapse for ''revolving door'' inpatients
. Both depot therapy and atypical antipsychotics were commonly recomme
nded and ultimately accepted by about 2/3rds of patients. Choice betwe
en depot and atypical was driven by the assessed cause of relapse. In
summary, it seems possible to identify ''revolving door'' inpatients,
and to target specific medication interventions within the time frame
of an acute inpatient admission.