Background Use of laparoscopy in the management of the impalpable test
is remains controversial. Localization of the testis may help plan or
obviate the need for groin exploration. This study reviews the need fo
r inguinal exploration with respect to laparoscopic findings, particul
arly of vas and vessels entering a closed deep inguinal ring. Method C
ase notes of boys undergoing laparoscopy for undescended testes were r
eviewed retrospectively. Results Of 86 impalpable testes, 32 were intr
a-abdominal and ten were absent with intra-abdominal blind ending vas
and vessels. In 17 instances the vas and vessels entered an open inter
nal ring and in 26 a closed internal ring. In one boy neither vas, ves
sels nor testis were visualized. Of the 26 impalpable testes with a cl
osed internal ring, excision of testicular remnants in 18 revealed no
histological testicular parenchyma, one boy had bilateral perineal ect
opic testes missed clinically and six were not explored. Conclusion Th
e laparoscopic finding of vas and vessels entering a closed deep ingui
nal ring should prompt a careful examination for an ectopic testis. If
a palpable testis can be ruled out, inguinal exploration is not neces
sary, as viable testicular parenchyma is rarely found. Laparoscopy wou
ld have avoided negative exploration in 42 per cent of impalpable test
es in this series.