Background Whilst oesophageal manometry outcomes following fundoplicat
ion performed by open techniques have been described, detailed reports
of changes in manometric parameters following large series of laparos
copic Nissen fundoplication have yet to be described. Methods An analy
sis of oesophageal manometry studies performed on patients undergoing
laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication at the Royal Adelaide Hospital was
performed to quantitate the effect of surgery and to determine whether
manometric indicators of adverse surgical outcome could be identified
. The original manometric recordings from a subset of 103 patients wer
e reviewed. Only patients who had undergone preoperative and postopera
tive examinations in this department, and assessment by an independent
investigator using a standardized clinical questionnaire, were includ
ed in the study. Results Mean resting lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS
) pressure increased from 8.5 to 21.5 mmHg (P < 0.0001) following surg
ery, the mean residual pressure after sphincter relaxation (residual r
elaxation pressure) increased from 1.2 to 10.8 mmHg (P<0.0001), and oe
sophageal 'ramp' pressure increased from 10.5 to 20.5 mmHg (P < 0.0001
). Before operation 88 patients (85 per cent) propagated seven or more
of ten wet swallows (normal peristalsis) versus 83 (81 per cent) afte
r operation. Of the 15 patients with abnormal peristalsis before surge
ry, eight regained normal peristalsis after operation, whereas 13 of 8
8 patients with normal preoperative peristalsis subsequently had defec
tive postoperative peristalsis. Raised postoperative residual relaxati
on pressure (r = 0.20) but not LOS pressure correlated significantly w
ith postoperative dysphagia for liquids. None of the measured manometr
ic parameters correlated with adverse outcomes such as postoperative d
ysphagia for solids, patient dissatisfaction or gas bloat. Conclusion
Whilst this study documents significant changes in LOS pressure follow
ing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, a clinically significant corre
lation between manometric outcome and clinical outcome was not demonst
rated.