Ac. Hackney et al., REPRODUCTIVE HORMONAL RESPONSES TO MAXIMAL EXERCISE IN ENDURANCE-TRAINED MEN WITH LOW RESTING TESTOSTERONE LEVELS, EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & DIABETES, 105(5), 1997, pp. 291-295
A cross-sectional study was conducted to compare the changes from rest
and in response to a maximal exercise bout for select reproductive ho
rmones between age matched groups of endurance trained (ET; distance r
unners) men with low resting testosterone and untrained (UT) men. Both
ET and UT men completed two evaluation sessions: (a) resting hormonal
profiling, and (b) a maximal treadmill exercise test to exhaustion. S
erial blood samples were taken for four hours at each of the evaluatio
n sessions. Resting and exercise hormonal concentrations were plotted
and the area under the response curve (AUG) measured. Percentage chang
e in AUC values were also calculated and compared (exercise vs. restin
g AUC values). Resting testosterone (16.6 +/- 2.4 vs. 23.9 +/- 3.1 nmo
l . l(-1)) and prolactin (3.3 +/- 1.4 vs. 6.0 +/- 2.0 mu g . l(-1)) co
ncentrations in the ET men were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than th
ose in the UT men. All other resting hormonal levels did not differ be
tween the groups (p > 0.05). Exercise produced a significant increase
(p < 0.05) in the ET men for testosterone, LH, and prolactin AUC value
s, when compared to resting values. In the UT men the only significant
change was a reduction (p < 0.05) in the exercise LH AUC versus the r
esting AUC value. AUC percentage change values showed between-group di
fferences (p < 0.05) for testosterone, LH and prolactin. The level of
change in each of these hormones was found to be greater in the ET tha
n UT group (approximate to 20 to 75%). The hormonal changes of the UT
men were viewed as ''control - reference'' responses within a function
ing hypothalamo-pituitary-testicular regulatory axis; therefore, it wa
s concluded that the ET men displayed an ''atypical'' response to exer
cise to that of UT men relative to this axis.