A. Apter et al., SUICIDAL ADOLESCENTS AND EGO DEFENSE-MECHANISMS, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(11), 1997, pp. 1520-1527
To identify defense mechanisms that characterize adolescents with a ra
nge of suicidal behaviors and to differentiate them from nonsuicidal a
dolescents, Method: Fifty-five suicidal adolescent inpatients admitted
for a definite suicide attempt were compared with 87 adolescent inpat
ients who had no history of suicide attempt or ideation and 81 nonpati
ents, Defense mechanisms were assessed by the Ego Defense Scale (EDS)
which is part of a larger semistructured interview, the Child Suicide
Potential Scale (CSPS), and by a self-report questionnaire, the tife S
tyle index (LSI), The CSPS was also used to quantify violent and suici
dal behaviors. Results: On the LSI suicidal adolescent patients scored
higher on denial, displacement, repression, and total defenses than t
he nonpatients. On the EDS they scored higher on regression, denial, p
rojection, introjection, repression, and total defenses and lower on s
ublimation. LSI scores on displacement (higher) and on compensation (l
ower) distinguished suicidal from nonsuicidal inpatients. Denial and r
egression correlated positively and sublimation correlated negatively
with both suicidal and violent behaviors, Introjection and repression
correlated with suicidal behavior only. Conclusions: Overuse of displa
cement is connected with increased risk for suicidal and aggressive be
haviors, while sublimation is probably a protective factor, In additio
n, several immature ego defenses possibly amplify aggression, which th
en is directed against the self by the maladaptive overuse of introjec
tion, displacement, and repression.