Objective The authors' 8-year experience with both inpatient and outpa
tient left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support is presented to sh
ow the possibilities and limitations of long-term outpatient mechanica
l circulatory assistance. Summary Background Data The limitation of su
itable cardiac donors has led to the use of LVADs as a temporizing mea
sure for patients awaiting cardiac transplantation. The success of suc
h devices in the short and medium term as a bridge to transplantation
has led to their evaluation as a longterm destination therapy for end-
stage heart disease. Methods Between August 1990 and February 1997, 85
patients with end-stage heart disease underwent insertion of implanta
ble LVADs. Fifty-two patients underwent pneumatic device insertion and
32 patients received a vented electric device. Results Patients were
supported for a mean of 109 +/- 13 days for an overall survival to tra
nsplant (54) or explant (3) of 73%. Nineteen patients were discharged
from the hospital on a mean of postoperative day 41 +/- 4 (range, 17-6
8) for an outpatient support time of 108 +/- 30 days (range, 2-466). O
f 12 patients supported after postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock, 10 (82
%) survived to hospital discharge. Perioperative right ventricular fai
lure was treated in most patients with inotropic agents and inhaled ni
tric oxide with only six patients requiring right ventricular assist d
evice support. Thromboembolic rate was low (0.016 events/patient-month
) despite minimal or no anticoagulation in all cases. Conclusions Left
ventricular assist device support has evolved to become an outpatient
therapy with excellent survival rates and an acceptable morbidity. Ac
cordingly, wearable LVADs should be studied as permanent treatment opt
ions for patients who are not transplant candidates.