Mj. Heslin et al., A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF EARLY ENTERAL FEEDING AFTER RESECTION OF UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL MALIGNANCY, Annals of surgery, 226(4), 1997, pp. 567-577
Objective The purpose of the study was to determine whether early post
operative enteral feeding with an immune-enhancing formula (IEF) decre
ases morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay in patients wit
h upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. Summary Background Data Early en
teral feeding with an IEF has been associated with improved outcome in
trauma and critical care patients. Evaluable data documenting reduced
complications after major upper GI surgery for malignancy with early
enteral feeding are limited. Methods Between March 1994 and August 199
6, 195 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of esophageal (n = 23),
gastric (n = 75), peripancreatic (n = 86), or bile duct (n = 11) cance
r underwent resection and were randomized to IEF via jejunostomy tube
or control (CNTL). Tube feedings were supplemented with arginine, RNA,
and omega-3 fatty acids, begun on postoperative 1, and advanced to a-
goal of 25 kcal/kg per day. The CNTL involved intravenous crystalloid
solutions. Statistical analysis was by t test, chi square, or logistic
regression. Results Patient demographics, nutritional status, and ope
rative factors were similar between the groups. Caloric intake was 61%
and 22% of goal for the IEF and CNTL groups, respectively. The IEF gr
oup received significantly more protein, carbohydrate, lipids and immu
ne-enhancing nutrients than did the CNTL group. There were no signific
ant differences in the number of minor, major, or infectious wound com
plications between the groups. There was one bowel necrosis associated
with IEF requiring reoperation. Hospital mortality was 2.5% and media
n length of hospital stay was 11 days, which was not different between
the groups. Conclusion Early enteral feeding with an IEF was not bene
ficial and should not be used in a routine fashion after surgery for u
pper GI malignancies.