Consider the OECD, and divide it into two regions: Japan and the rest.
How have rates of profit, the history of capital accumulation and the
growth of demand and supply, interregional investment and trade inter
acted to produce their historical geography? What can we learn from th
at data about theories of profit, growth, and interregional competitio
n? In this paper, I estimate the parameters of a disequilibrium, dynam
ic, interregional model that illuminates these questions, paying parti
cular attention to the manner in which investment is generated and flo
ws between regions. I find a complex relationship between productivity
and costs, profitability and accumulation. These variables are not we
ll correlated over space. The evidence prompts questions about the wei
ght that is given to profitability in interpreting the growth of regio
ns. More important are the availability of funds (generated by the exi
sting capital stock), the production intentions of corporations, and t
he investment policies of financiers. Likewise, over time profitabilit
y and accumulation are correlated, but this correlation is strong only
in the long run; in the short run, rates of growth are determined far
more by production decisions and investment policies than by changes
in the rate of profit.