IS LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE FLOW A PREDICTOR FOR OUTCOME OF CARDIOVERSION OF NONVALVULAR ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION - A TRANSTHORACIC AND TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC STUDY
Y. Perez et al., IS LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE FLOW A PREDICTOR FOR OUTCOME OF CARDIOVERSION OF NONVALVULAR ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION - A TRANSTHORACIC AND TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC STUDY, The American heart journal, 134(4), 1997, pp. 745-751
Accurate echocardiographic parameters for predicting the success of ca
rdioversion or maintenance of sinus rhythm are poorly defined. This pr
ospective transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic study wa
s conducted to test the hypothesis that the left atrial appendage flow
pattern could be a predictive parameter of the success of cardioversi
on and maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with nonvalvular atrial
fibrillation. Eighty-two consecutive patients with nonvalvular atrial
fibrillation of less than or equal to 6 months' duration underwent tr
ansesophageal examination after transthoracic echocardiography. After
exclusion of left atrial thrombus, pharmacologic (n = 18) or electrica
l (n = 64) cardioversion was successful in 75 of 82 patients. In the g
roup that underwent successful cardioversion, maintenance of sinus rhy
thm (n = 35) or recurrence of arrhythmia (n = 40) was assessed during
a 1-year follow-up. During transesophageal examination, five left atri
al appendage thrombi were found, spontaneous echo contrast was present
in 26 (32%) patients; and mean peak left atrial appendage emptying ve
locity was 35 +/- 18 cm/sec. Peak left atrial appendage emptying veloc
ity was found to be statistically related to parameters of left ventri
cular and left atrial function but not to long-term maintenance of sin
us rhythm. No other echocardiographic parameter was identified as a pr
edictor for either the success of cardioversion or the maintenance of
sinus rhythm at follow-up. In patients with nonvolvular atrial fibrill
ation of recent onset, peak left atrial appendage emptying velocity ap
pears to be a complex parameter depending on left atrial and left vent
ricular function but that does not predict either the success rate of
cardioversion or long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm after successfu
l cardioversion.