Rr. Bailey et al., EFFECT OF LACIDIPINE, A DIHYDROPYRIDINE CALCIUM-ANTAGONIST ON RENAL-FUNCTION OF HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS WITH RENAL-INSUFFICIENCY, Clinical nephrology, 48(4), 1997, pp. 224-229
There are few studies on the use of dihydropyridine calcium antagonist
s in hypertensive patients with moderate renal insufficiency. We under
took an open study on the effects on renal function, albumin excretion
and blood pressure of the slow-onset, long-acting dihydropyridine cal
cium antagonist, lacidipine, in 14 patients with stable, chronic renal
insufficiency (mean assessed GFR 0.78 ml/s, range 0.50-1.17 ml/s) and
moderate hypertension. Following a 2 week washout phase, lacidipine w
as administered for 24 weeks in a dose of 2 mg/day with the dose being
titrated at 2 weekly intervals to a maximum of 6 mg/day in order to a
chieve adequate blood pressure control. Frusemide was introduced if bl
ood pressure was not controlled on the maximum lacidipine dose. Blood
pressure, creatinine clearance, 24 h urinary albumin excretion and pla
sma creatinine and albumin concentrations were measured at regular int
ervals throughout the study. Isotopic GFR was determined at the end of
the washout period and at week 24. Lacidipine was not very effective
in controlling blood pressure and had an adverse effect on renal funct
ion. In 3 patients with an incipient nephrotic syndrome this necessita
ted withdrawal from the study. Mean GFR of the 10 patients who complet
ed the study decreased from 0.69 ml/s/1.73 m(2) at baseline to 0.56 ml
/s/1.73 m(2) at week 24 (p = 0.006) with a decline in GFR being observ
ed in 9 of these patients. The decrease in GFR was greatest in patient
s with poorly controlled blood pressure. An insignificant increase in
mean urinary albumin excretion occurred during the study with this inc
rease being observed only in patients with albuminuria >1 g/24 h at ba
seline. These findings indicated that systemic hypertension altered gl
omerular hemodynamics and that the vasodilatation of pre-glomerular ve
ssels which followed introduction of the calcium antagonist may have e
xacerbated this situation. The withdrawal of an angiotensin converting
enzyme inhibitor during the washout period may have contributed to th
ese changes. We suggest that renal function should be monitored closel
y in patients with renal insufficiency when a calcium antagonise is be
ing used to control blood pressure, particularly in those with either
marginal blood pressure control, significant albuminuria or an incipie
nt nephrotic syndrome.