CLINICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF DICEA A NEW CELLULOSE MEMBRANE FOR HEMODIALYSIS

Citation
Na. Hoenich et al., CLINICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF DICEA A NEW CELLULOSE MEMBRANE FOR HEMODIALYSIS, Clinical nephrology, 48(4), 1997, pp. 253-259
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
ISSN journal
03010430
Volume
48
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
253 - 259
Database
ISI
SICI code
0301-0430(1997)48:4<253:CCODAN>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
A prospective randomised clinical study comparing the functional perfo rmance and biocompatibility of a new cellulose diacetate variant (Dice a) in which the degree of hydroxyl group substitution differes, with c ellulose diacetate and low flux polysulfone incorporated into commerci ally produced hollow fiber hemodialysers with a surface area 1.5-1.6 m (2) has been undertaken. All dialysers studied demonstrated clinically acceptable performance in terms of their small molecular removal char acteristics, with minor statistical but not clinical differences. Use of both cellulose diacetate membranes but not low flux polysulfone res ulted in a reduction in plasma beta(2) microglobulin levels. The membr anes were impermeable to albumin, but showed some permeability to low molecular weight proteins. The average protein recovery from the dialy sis fluid was 3105 mg for Dicea, 2913 mg for cellulose diacetate and 2 842 mg for low flux polysulfone. For Dicea the white cell count by 15 minutes had declined to 68% of pre treatment value, compared with 59% and 86% for cellulose diacetate and low flux polysulfone. The differen ces between Dicea and cellulose diacetate were not significant, but bo th cellulose based membranes differed from low flux polysulfone (p = 0 .0015). There was a strong evidence of differences between the membran es in respect of C5a and C5b-9 generation (p = 0.0001) but not for C3a (p = 0.16) furthermore the levels of C5b-9 generated during dialysis also showed a significant positive correlation compared to C5a for all membranes. (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.856, p = 0.0001). I t is concluded that the two cellulose diacetate membranes are not iden tical, with the differences observed being a consequence of the degree of acetyl substitution, resulting in alteration of membrane structure and the method of sterilization. The clinical significance of these d ifferences are difficult to characterize but the modification of the c ellulose structure appears to be a promising method to improve the bio compatibility of cellulose membranes. The improved biocompatibility of fered by this method still falls short of that achieved with low flux synthetic membranes such as Fresenius Polysulfone.