Images of the ocean surface taken with active microwave sensors often
contain much information on near-surface and subsurface processes. How
ever, their interpretations may depend on a detailed understanding of
the physics of electromagnetic scatter. In scattering theory, the surf
ace hydrodynamics enters the equations via (1) the probability distrib
ution function for either wave heights or slopes, and (2) the two-dime
nsional wave height/slope autocovariance or its Fourier transform, the
wave vector spectrum. This paper advances an improved model for the o
cean surface wave vector spectrum based on recent work by M. A. Donela
n, by M. L. Banner, and by B. Jahne and their collaborators. The model
addresses the range of surface wavelengths from fully developed wind
waves to the gravity-capillary region. For gravity-capillary waves, th
e spectral equation satisfactorily represents the observational data o
f Jahne et al. taken in tanks at large fetches, in the range from appr
oximately 50 to 1500 rad/m to within the accuracy of the data. From th
e spectrum, the two-dimensional autocovariance of the sea surface is c
omputed and correlation lengths and curvatures obtained. When used wit
h a modification of Holliday's formulation of microwave radar backscat
ter from a Gaussian sea, it quantitatively reproduces observational cr
oss section data taken at vertical polarization from aircraft and spac
ecraft over the open ocean, with differences from the field data havin
g a mean of -0.2 dB and a standard deviation of 1.7 dB. The range of p
arameters for which satisfactory fits are obtained includes: wind spee
ds from 1.5 to 24 m/s; frequencies from approximately 5.5 to 35 GHz; a
nd incidence angles from 0-degrees to greater than 60-degrees. For hor
izontal polarization, the scattering calculations fail rather badly fo
r larger incidence angles, as do all theories based on the Kirchhoff a
pproximation. Additionally, in spite of the incorporation of an anisot
ropic angular distribution of wave energy, the observed azimuthal vari
ation of radar scatter is not captured, indicating that the source of
that variation lies elsewhere.