Three experiments examined interference effects in concurrent temporal
and nontemporal tasks. The timing task in each experiment required su
bjects to generate a series of 2- or B-sec temporal productions. The n
ontemporal tasks were pursuit rotor tracking (Experiment 1), visual se
arch (Experiment 2), and mental arithmetic (Experiment 3). Each non te
mporal task had two levels of difficulty. All tasks were performed und
er both single-and dual-task conditions. A simple attentional allocati
on model predicts bidirectional interference between concurrent tasks.
The main results showed the classic interference effect in timing. Th
at is, the concurrent nontemporal tasks caused temporal productions to
become longer (longer productions represent a shortening of perceived
time) and/or more variable than did timing-only conditions. In genera
l, the difficult version of each nontemporal task disrupted timing mor
e than the easier version. The timing data also exhibited a serial len
gthening effect, in which temporal productions became longer across tr
ials. Nontemporal task performance showed a mixed pattern. Tracking an
d visual search were essentially unaffected by the addition of a timin
g task, whereas mental arithmetic was disrupted by concurrent timing.
These results call for a modification of the attentional allocation mo
del to incorporate the idea ol specialized processing resources. Two m
ajor theoretical frameworks-multiple resource theory and the working m
emory model-are critically evaluated with respect to the resource dema
nds of timing and temporal/nontemporal dual-task performance.