Ym. Irshaid et al., COMPARATIVE PHARMACOKINETICS OF 2 BRANDS OF CEFUROXIME FOLLOWING A SINGLE INTRAMUSCULAR INJECTION, International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 33(5), 1995, pp. 285-293
The pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC(0-8h), AUC(0-infinity), C-max, t(m
ax), t(1/2), K-e) of cefuroxime following a single intramuscular injec
tion of 750 mg of a test product (Maxil, Hikma Pharmaceuticals, Amman,
Jordan) were compared to those of a reference product (Zinacef, Glare
, UK). The 2 products were administered according to a randomized 2-wa
y crossover design to 26 healthy male volunteers. Cefuroxime plasma co
ncentrations were determined using a rapid, sensitive and precise HPLC
method with UV detection at 280 nm. The means of the ratios AUC(0-inf
inity), Maxil/AUC(0-infinity) Zinacef and C-max Maxil/C-max Zinacef we
re close to 1 and their 900/0 confidence intervals included 1. The mea
n pharmacokinetic parameters of the 2 products were not different and
their 90% confidence intervals overlapped. The 2 products were not sta
tistically different with respect to both rate and extent of absorptio
n as demonstrated by statistical analysis on C-max, t(max), AUC(0-8h)
and AUC(0-infinity). The 2 products were also similar regarding t(1/2)
and K-e. The ANOVA analysis showed no differences in the pharmacokine
tic parameters of the 2 products in relation to treatment, sequence of
product administration or the interaction term. Pharmacokinetic param
eters of cefuroxime were comparable to reported values. We conclude th
at the 2 products of cefuroxime (Maxil and Zinacef) are bioequivalent.