Sociological discussions of romance novels are sparse. As a cultural a
rtifact, the formulaic genre of romance fiction (and its more than 50
million readers) has been ignored by many scholars, disdained by some
for its mass-pop culture appeal, and condemned as a tool of the ''patr
iarchal apparatus'' by others. Some feminist scholars have cautioned a
gainst outright dismissal, however, pointing to oppositional codes and
empowering elements in the texts themselves. have highlighted the exp
ectations readers bring with them to the text. This important, though
limited, discourse has contributed to the enduring debate over culture
, that is, structure versus agency. We argue that the debate has remai
ned one sided, as those who claim to afford women readers autonomy hav
e done so within an equally deterministic framework (i.e., feminist po
litics). Implications for affording readers even more autonomy are dis
cussed.