HYDROGEN-BONDING IN GLYCINE AND MALONALDEHYDE - PERFORMANCE OF THE LAP1 CORRELATION FUNCTIONAL

Citation
S. Sirois et al., HYDROGEN-BONDING IN GLYCINE AND MALONALDEHYDE - PERFORMANCE OF THE LAP1 CORRELATION FUNCTIONAL, The Journal of chemical physics, 107(17), 1997, pp. 6770-6781
Citations number
58
Categorie Soggetti
Physics, Atomic, Molecular & Chemical
ISSN journal
00219606
Volume
107
Issue
17
Year of publication
1997
Pages
6770 - 6781
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9606(1997)107:17<6770:HIGAM->2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
The conformational equilibrium of gaseous glycine presents a severe ch allenge to quantum chemistry and, in particular, to density functional theory (DFT), due to the presence of internal hydrogen bonds. We pres ent new DFT results for the structure and the energetics of glycine an d malonaldehyde, using the recently developed nonlocal exchange-correl ation functionals BLap1 and PLap1. A comparative analysis is made with the results of the generalized-gradient-approximation (GGA) schemes B ecke-Perdew (BP86) and Becke-Lee-Yang-Parr (BLYP), the hybrid Hartree- Fock (HF)-DFT methods B3PW91 and B3LYP, with post-HF methods, and with the available experimental data. Our BLap1/TZVP and PLap1/TZVP values for the energy margin between the two lowest conformers of glycine (0 .84 and 1.05 kcal/mol, respectively) are within the experimental error bars (1.0+/-0.5 kcal/mol). MP2 underestimates this energy difference by about 0.5 kcal/mol, BLYP and the hybrid methods are off by about 0. 9 kcal/mol. The optimized geometry of malonaldehyde is improved with t he Lap1 functionals, compared to the GGA results reported previously. Improvement over the GGA is also achieved for the energy barrier for t he internal proton transfer in malonaldehyde. Recent high quality post -HF (G2) calculations of Barone and Adamo(1) yield 4.4 kcal/mol. The b est GGA (PP86) value of 2.1 kcal/mol is seriously underestimated. The best B3LYP estimate is 3.0 kcal/mol.(1) Our BLap1/TZVP (3.28 kcal/mol) and PLap1/TZVP (4.56 kcal/mol) values are in the correct energy range , the latter being, in fact, very close to the G2 estimate. (C) 1997 A merican Institute of Physics. [S0021-9606(97)02741-4].