POLYGRAPH TESTIMONY AND JUROR JUDGMENTS - A COMPARISON OF THE GUILTY KNOWLEDGE TEST AND THE CONTROL QUESTION TEST

Citation
B. Myers et J. Arbuthnot, POLYGRAPH TESTIMONY AND JUROR JUDGMENTS - A COMPARISON OF THE GUILTY KNOWLEDGE TEST AND THE CONTROL QUESTION TEST, Journal of applied social psychology, 27(16), 1997, pp. 1421-1437
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Social
ISSN journal
00219029
Volume
27
Issue
16
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1421 - 1437
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9029(1997)27:16<1421:PTAJJ->2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
The present experiment investigated the impact of the Control Question Test (CQT) and the Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT) on the verdicts of moc k jurors. Although studies have indicated that polygraph evidence has little influence on jurors' verdicts (Cavoukian & Heselgrave, 1980; Sp anos, Myers, Dubreuil, & Pawlak, 1992-1993), no research has previousl y distinguished between the different types of polygraph tests and the ir impact on juror verdicts. In the present study, jurors were shown a videotape of a simulated rape-murder trial that contained either CQT polygraph evidence, GKT polygraph evidence, or no polygraph evidence. No differences were found among the 3 conditions for either jury verdi cts or individual juror verdicts, and jurors tended to rate both forms of polygraph polygraph testimony below other forms of equally suspect evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, in its influence on their dec ision-making process.