Postmodern work on identities and ethnic conflict claims the primacy o
f historically grounded master ''narratives'' or ''representations'' o
ver ''facts.'' Postmodern studies of Hindu-Muslim conflict in India ba
se their arguments on an aggregation of conforming cases, not on varia
nce. A comparison of communally peaceful and violent towns accounts fo
r the triumph of ''representations.'' The validity of postmodern argum
ents about ethnic conflicts thus depends on the absence of interethnic
networks of civic engagement.