PURPOSE: Having observed that a cold presser test (CPT) induces a decr
ease in carbon monoxide single breath diffusing capacity (DLco) in nor
mal subjects contrary to the findings of Fahey et al (Am J Med. 1984;7
6:263-269), we compared the response to CPT for the two types of Rayna
ud's phenomenon. PATIENTS: TWO groups of 8 patients suffering from pri
mary or secondary Raynaud's phenomenon were examined. METHODS: Single
breath diffusing capacity, mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), cardi
ac output (CO), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PwP), and pulmonar
y vascular resistance (PVR) were measured before and 30 minutes after
CPT, which consisted of immersing both hands in a water bath at 12 deg
rees C for 2 minutes. RESULTS: Cold presser testing induced no change
in DLco or cardiovascular parameters in patients with secondary Raynau
d's phenomenon. Conversely, in patients with the primary form, it indu
ced a significant decrease in DLco (16%), PAP (20%), and PVR (27%), wh
ereas CO and PwP remained unaltered. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of pulmo
nary Raynaud's phenomenon had to be reconsidered, as it is also observ
ed in normal subjects, and is due to a vasodilatation and not to a vas
oconstriction of the pulmonary artery (Frans et al, J Appl Physiol. 19
94;76:750-755). In patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon, the dec
rease in DLco is not only a physiological response, but a pathological
response to a CPT, as it is significantly more marked in patients tha
n in control subjects (16% versus 10% for controls, same reference). T
he contribution by Fahey et al remains important, however, in that it
allows assessing whether a patient with Raynaud's phenomenon suffers f
rom the primary or secondary form of the disease. (C) 1996 by Excrpta
Medica, Inc.