A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF THE RANGING BEHAVIOR, ACTIVITY RHYTHMS AND SOCIALITY OF LEPILEMUR-EDWARDSI (PRIMATES, LEPILEMURIDAE) AND AVAHI-OCCIDENTALIS (PRIMATES, INDRIIDAE) AT AMPIJOROA, MADAGASCAR
Rd. Warren et Rh. Crompton, A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF THE RANGING BEHAVIOR, ACTIVITY RHYTHMS AND SOCIALITY OF LEPILEMUR-EDWARDSI (PRIMATES, LEPILEMURIDAE) AND AVAHI-OCCIDENTALIS (PRIMATES, INDRIIDAE) AT AMPIJOROA, MADAGASCAR, Journal of zoology, 243, 1997, pp. 397-415
Lepilemur edwardsi and Avahi occidentalis are both small, nocturnal fo
livores, but live sympatrically over a large part of their range, sugg
esting that niche differentiation has occurred. In order to establish
whether ranging behaviour and activity patterns have contributed to ni
che differentiation, a field-study was carried out at Ampijoroa, Madag
ascar, within the area of range overlap. Four individuals of each spec
ies were fitted with radiocollars and tracked, dusk to dawn, over 18 m
onths. Data were collected on home-range size, travel distances, activ
ity and social behaviour. Neither showed the markedly biphasic activit
y patterns which have often been described for nocturnal prosimians; t
his might be explained by the combination of folivory and small body s
ize. L. edwardsi spent long periods inactive, but engaged in considera
ble social interaction during the night, including extensive long-rang
e calling. The mean home range was 1.09 ha, and ranges were rather eve
nly used. Home ranges of females overlapped extensively, and the range
of the single adult male which could be caught overlapped with the ra
nges of several females, as is common in nocturnal prosimians. The mea
n nightly travel distance was very low, only 343 metres. On the other
hand social interactions in A. occidentalis were primarily within a st
able monogamous family unit, and long-range calling was very limited.
Home ranges were rather larger than in L. edwardsi, but less evenly us
ed, and mean nightly travel distances were much greater, 1175 m. Diffe
rences in range-use patterns may be explained by the contrast between
Avahi's selective feeding on relatively high-quality young leaves and
flowers, versus Lepilemur edwardsi's unselective feeding on relatively
low-quality, but ubiquitous and evenly-distributed, mature and old le
aves. Similarly, while overlapping female ranges may be adequate when
food resources are evenly distributed, monogamy in Avahi may be a resp
onse to selective feeding on a patchy food resource.