Jpc. Farcy et Fj. Schwab, MANAGEMENT OF FLATBACK AND RELATED KYPHOTIC DECOMPENSATION SYNDROMES, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 22(20), 1997, pp. 2452-2457
Study Design. The authors, in this retrospective study, examined a gro
up of patients with flatback syndrome and a related kyphotic decompens
ation syndrome. Results of nonrealignment treatment as well as revisio
n surgery with sagittal realignment were reviewed. Objectives. To dete
rmine effectiveness of physical therapy and limited surgical (instrume
ntation removal) as well as major realignment surgical treatment in th
e sagittally malaligned spine. Summary of Background Data. Flatback is
a sagittal plane deformity associated with distraction instrumentatio
n for scoliosis correction. Kyphotic decompensation syndrome involves
malaligned fusions from the sacrum for disease other than scoliosis. S
everal studies describe surgical realignment for flatback involving in
strumentation systems no longer commonly applied. Guidelines for a sys
tematic approach to flatback and kyphotic decompensation syndromes are
lacking.Methods. Forty-eight patients with flatback and kyphotic deco
mpensation syndromes were reviewed. Treatment groups were defined by t
reatment approach and level of previous fusion. Effectiveness of treat
ment was reviewed in terms of radiographic sagittal alignment and self
-reported pain. Results. Twenty patients were treated without realignm
ent revision surgery. Twenty-eight patients were treated with anterior
and posterior osteotomies and realignment with instrumentation. For p
atients originally fused to the sacrum, realignment averaged 12 cm. Pa
in was reduced from 7 to 3 (10-point scale). In patients fused to L4 o
r L5, realignment averaged 7 cm. Pain was reduced from 6 to 2. Magneti
c resonance imaging revealed viable caudal discs in four patients who
were consequently spared extension of fusion to the sacrum. Conclusion
s. Treatment without realignment surgery demonstrated long-term succes
s in 27% of cases. The latter all had two intact discs below the previ
ous fusion and sagittal malalignment less than 4 cm. Realignment surge
ry effectively reduced pain in patients failing a conservative approac
h.