A. Grassi et al., MEDIUM-LARGE POLYPS OF THE COLON - A CONTRIBUTION FOR THEIR CLINICAL PROFILE AND A PROPER SURVEILLANCE, Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research, 16(3), 1997, pp. 313-319
A retrospective analysis of polypoid lesions of the colon larger than
1 cm. was performed with the aim to study their characteristics and a
proper surveillance schedule. We reviewed all colon polypoid lesions l
arger than 1 cm. found and treated during the period January 1984- Dec
ember 1993 that were not considered cancer macroscopically. The record
s of 361 patients with 391 polyps are the object of this report. The p
olyps were divided into subgroups according to size: A) less than 20 m
m., B) between 21 and 30 mm., and C) larger than 30 mm, Out of 391 pol
ypoid lesions 373 were adenomas, 60% were found in males. The age grou
p distribution showed no differences among the subgroups, The peduncul
ated type showed a decrease from 69.1% to 43.3% with the increasing of
size: inverse figures were observed for sessile polyps. The lesions w
ere mainly located in left colon. Synchronous adenomas were found in 2
5.4% patients, and metachronous and previous adenomas respectively in
24.8% and 5.2%: no significant difference was present in the subgroups
. Synchronous malignancy in the colon was found in 2% of the patients.
Histological characteristics demonstrated a decrease of tubular adeno
ma from 46.5% to 22.6% from subgroup A to C, while villous adenomas in
creased inversely from 6.6% to 15.1%. The presence of severe dysplasia
ranged from 20.9% to 56.1% in subgroups A and C, respectively, and ad
enomas with invasive cancer showed a significant increase from the sub
groupA to C, respectively from 4.3% to 10.5%, During an average 36-mon
th follow-up we observed 2 metachronous colon cancers, surgically trea
ted in Dukes stage B, 84 metachronous adenomas, all less than 10 mm. a
nd without malignant alterations. Our data confirm other literature re
ports regarding the profile of colon adenomas with an increasing risk
of malignancy with the increase of size and the presence of villous st
ructure. In our opinion the assessment of a ''clean colon'' status is
important when an adenoma is found in the colon. The proper follow-up
for adenomas must be tailored for any individual patient when risk fac
tors such as size, villous structure, personal and family history of n
eoplastic lesions of the colon are present. The follow-up schedule, pr
esently recommended for colon adenomas, must be flexible according to
these parameters.