TREADMILL TESTING FOR EVALUATION OF CLAUDICATION - COMPARISON OF CONSTANT-LOAD AND GRADED-EXERCISE TESTS

Citation
M. Cachovan et al., TREADMILL TESTING FOR EVALUATION OF CLAUDICATION - COMPARISON OF CONSTANT-LOAD AND GRADED-EXERCISE TESTS, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 14(4), 1997, pp. 238-243
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Peripheal Vascular Diseas
ISSN journal
10785884
Volume
14
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
238 - 243
Database
ISI
SICI code
1078-5884(1997)14:4<238:TTFEOC>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the correlation and practicability of single-st age vs. graded treadmill protocols in the assessment of the absolute c laudication distance (ACD). Design: Randomized open study. Material an d methods: In 52 patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease, the ACD on treadmill at 3km/h and 12% grade (constant-load test = C-te st) ranged from 50 to 400m. The C-test and the graded-exercise test (w alking on the treadmill at 3km/h and 0% gradient for 3 min, with subse quent increase in gradient of 3.5% every 3 min = G-test) were carried out at random on the same clay under standardized conditions. Results: The ACD was higher in the G-test than in the C-test (360.4+/-208.8m v s. 166.5+/-93.6m; p<0.001). The coefficients of variation were very si milar (57.9% and 56.2%, respectively). In the subgroup of patients wit h an ACD between 100m and 150m, a large difference was found both for the coefficient of variation (58.6% G-test, 9.6% C-test) and for the s tandard deviation (339.8+/-199.0m and 133.1+/-12.8m, respectively). Co nclusions: For the assessment of the ACD in patients with severe claud ication the C-test would seem to be more suitable than the G-test.