Sj. Rosenman et al., COMPUTERIZED DIAGNOSIS IN ACUTE PSYCHIATRY - VALIDITY OF CIDI-AUTO AGAINST ROUTINE CLINICAL-DIAGNOSIS, Journal of Psychiatric Research, 31(5), 1997, pp. 581-592
The validity of the self-administered CIDI-Auto for detecting ICD-IO d
iagnoses was assessed in a study of 126 patients admitted to an acute
psychiatry unit. A comparison was made between the level of agreement
of the CIDI-Auto with a psychiatrist and that between two psychiatrist
s. The CIDI-Auto generated an average of 2.3 diagnoses per subject, an
d the psychiatrists 1.3. Agreement measured by overall agreement and b
y Kappas between the CIDI-Auto and the psychiatrist's principal diagno
sis was poor, whereas agreement between psychiatrists was good. At the
level of general diagnostic class (e.g. substance use disorder, schiz
ophrenic disorder, mood disorder), agreement between CIDI-Auto and psy
chiatrist on principal diagnosis was poor, Kappa = 0.23, while agreeme
nt between psychiatrists was good, Kappa = 0.69. The findings indicate
that the self-administered CIDI-Auto has poor validity measured again
st clinical diagnosis for hospitalised patients of acute psychiatric s
ervices. Poor validity of computer-based diagnosis limits the diagnost
ic utility of these methods in clinical situations. II also creates un
certainty of diagnostic findings in survey use. (C) 1997 Elsevier Scie
nce Ltd.