This report is a component of an ongoing study of methods to determine
the modulus of elasticity (MOE) of wood. Dynamic methods provide rapi
d and accurate means to determine the MOE. For 19 clear specimens of e
picea common (Norway spruce, picea excelsa) we present a comparison of
results from tests by a resonance flexure method with results obtaine
d from static tension tests. The resonance flexure method provides a s
impler, more rapidly performed alternative to the classical static ten
sion method, giving MOE values that are nearly identical to those dete
rmined by the static tension method. These results, combined with our
previously reported comparisons of tests with resonance flexure and st
atic flexure, reveal that the resonance flexure method compares very w
ell with both static methods, and the procedure is performed more easi
ly and very rapidly. We also show that again the results from the reso
nance longitudinal method yield higher values of MOE, 5 percent higher
on average, and the ultrasonic method yields values even higher, 14 p
ercent on average.