R. Strumia et al., KERATOACANTHOMAS - HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS AND HERPES-SIMPLEX VIRUS-ASSOCIATED, JEADV. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 8(2), 1997, pp. 130-136
Background A viral cause for keratoacanthoma has been postulated by ma
ny investigators. Recently, some investigators reported the identifica
tion of genital high risk human papilloma virus types 16 and 18 in ker
atoacanthomas from transplant recipients. Observations We analysed by
polymerase chain reaction biopsies of six multiple keratoacanthomas an
d four solitary keratoacanthoma biopsies for the presence of the most
common genital papilloma viruses, All keratoacanthomas included in the
study had developed in skin areas exposed to sunlight. In addition, w
e analysed 16 normal skin tissue biopsies, Six of these control tissue
biopsies were from sun-exposed skin areas, while ID were from skin ar
eas not exposed to sunlight. None of the patients enrolled in the stud
y had clinical evidence of immunosuppression. As herpes simplex virus
is associated to a variety of skin diseases and might co-operate with
human papilloma virus in cervical cancer, the presence of this virus i
n bioptic specimens was also addressed. Results DNA sequences from onc
ogenic papilloma viruses type 16 and 18 were disclosed in two of four
solitary keratoacanthomas, three of six multiple keratoacanthomas and
four of six biopsies from sun-exposed normal skin. Non-oncogenic papil
loma viruses (type 6 or 11) were detected only in one biopsy from a mu
ltiple keratoacanthoma, and herpes simplex virus DNA was disclosed II
one solitary keratoacanthoma, one multiple keratoacanthoma and one tis
sue biopsy from sun-exposed skin. All specimens positive for herpes si
mplex virus were co-infected with human papilloma virus type 16, but t
his association was not statistically significant (Fisher's exact test
; P = 0.14). None of the tissue biopsies from sun-protected normal ski
n was positive for these viruses. The difference of viral prevalence i
n sun-exposed and non-exposed skin was statistically significant (P =
1.5 x 10(-3)). Conclusions In this study, human papilloma virus type 1
6 was detected with a high prevalence in keratoacanthomas and normal s
kin from immunocompetent individuals. The different prevalence of vira
l DNA in sun-exposed and non-exposed skin suggests that sunlight may f
avour viral infection. The comparable prevalence of viral DNA in neopl
astic and normal tissue from skin areas exposed to sunlight would indi
cate that human papilloma virus infection occurred after the onset of
neoplastic proliferation. In turn, the rapid growth of keratoacanthoma
s and the high viral prevalence (50%) would imply a high overall rate
of infection (and/or re-infection). The role of herpes simplex virus i
n this cutaneous pathology in unclear. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Irela
nd B.V.