CEREBRAL-ANGIOGRAPHY PRACTICES AT US TEACHING HOSPITALS - IMPLICATIONS FOR CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY

Citation
S. Chaturvedi et al., CEREBRAL-ANGIOGRAPHY PRACTICES AT US TEACHING HOSPITALS - IMPLICATIONS FOR CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY, Stroke, 28(10), 1997, pp. 1895-1897
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Peripheal Vascular Diseas","Clinical Neurology
Journal title
StrokeACNP
ISSN journal
00392499
Volume
28
Issue
10
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1895 - 1897
Database
ISI
SICI code
0039-2499(1997)28:10<1895:CPAUTH>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Background and Purpose Although several clinical trials of carotid end arterectomy (CE) have been carried out in the last decade, the methods for angiographic measurement of carotid stenosis have not been standa rdized. How one measures carotid stenosis may affect the applicability of clinical trial results. We sought to obtain information on cerebra l angiography practices at teaching hospitals in the United States. Me thods We surveyed hospitals with an accredited radiology residency pro gram. Results Of the 200 radiology program directors who were sent the survey, 97 responded. The angiographic complication rate was known in 68 of 97 medical centers and averaged 0.6%. The most common method be ing used for measurement of carotid stenosis is the NASCET method (70% ). Forty-two of 97 program directors reported a decrease in the volume of angiography being performed. Of these 42, one third reported that CE was commonly being performed on the basis of noninvasive tests alon e. Conclusions The angiographic complication rate at American teaching hospitals is within the ''acceptable'' range. The NASCET method of st enosis measurement is the most popular among academic radiologists. Th e volume of cerebral angiography appears to be decreasing. How these d ata compare with community hospitals without an accredited radiology r esidency program warrants further study.