Ra. Caplan et al., ADVERSE ANESTHETIC OUTCOMES ARISING FROM GAS DELIVERY EQUIPMENT - A CLOSED CLAIMS ANALYSIS, Anesthesiology, 87(4), 1997, pp. 741-748
Background Anesthesia gas delivery equipment is a potentially importan
t source of patient injury. To better define the contribution of gas d
elivery equipment to professional liability in anesthesia, the authors
conducted an in-depth analysis of cases from the database of the Amer
ican Society of Anesthesiologists Closed Claims Project. Methods: The
database of the Closed Claims Project is composed of closed US malprac
tice claims that have been collected in a standardized manner. All cla
ims resulting from the use of gas delivery equipment were reviewed for
recurrent patterns of injury. Results: Gas delivery equipment was ass
ociated with 72 (2%) of 3,791 claims in the database. Death and perman
ent brain damage accounted for almost all adverse outcomes (n = 55, 76
%). Equipment misuse was defined as fault or human error associated wi
th the preparation, maintenance, or deployment of a medical device. Eq
uipment failure was defined as unexpected malfunction of a medical dev
ice, despite routine maintenance and previous uneventful use. Misuse o
f equipment (n = 54, 75%) was three times more common than equipment f
ailure (n = 17, 24%). Misconnects and disconnects of the breathing cir
cuit made the largest contribution to injury (n = 25, 35%). Reviewers
judged that 38 of 72 claims (53%) could have been prevented by pulse o
ximetry, capnography, or a combination of these two monitors. Overall,
56 of 72 gas delivery claims (78%) were deemed preventable with the u
se or better use of monitors. The year of occurrence for claims involv
ing gas delivery equipment ranged from 1962 to 1991 and did not differ
significantly from claims involving other adverse respiratory events.
Conclusions: Claims associated with gas delivery equipment are infreq
uent but severe and continue to occur in the 1990s. Educational and pr
eventive strategies that focus on equipment misuse and breathing circu
it configuration may have the greatest potential for enhancing the saf
ety of anesthesia gas delivery equipment.