DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE BASED RISK ASSESSMENT-TOOL (STRATIFY) TO PREDICT WHICH ELDERLY INPATIENTS WILL FALL - CASE-CONTROL AND COHORT STUDIES

Citation
D. Oliver et al., DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE BASED RISK ASSESSMENT-TOOL (STRATIFY) TO PREDICT WHICH ELDERLY INPATIENTS WILL FALL - CASE-CONTROL AND COHORT STUDIES, BMJ. British medical journal, 315(7115), 1997, pp. 1049-1053
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
09598138
Volume
315
Issue
7115
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1049 - 1053
Database
ISI
SICI code
0959-8138(1997)315:7115<1049:DAEOEB>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Objectives: To identify clinical characteristics of elderly inpatients that predict their chance of falling (phase 1) and to use these chara cteristics to derive a risk assessment tool and to evaluate its power in predicting falls (phases 2 and 3). Design: Phase 1: a prospective c ase-control study. Phases 2 and 3: prospective evaluations of the deri ved risk assessment tool in predicting falls in two cohorts. Setting: Elderly care units of St Thomas's Hospital (phase 1 and 2) and Kent an d Canterbury Hospital (phase 3). Subjects: Elderly hospital inpatients (aged greater than or equal to 65 years): 116 cases and 116 controls in phase 1, 217 patients in phase 2, and 331 in phase 3. Main outcome measures: 21 separate clinical characteristics were assessed in phase 1, including the abbreviated mental test score, modified Barthel index , a transfer and mobility score obtained by combining the transfer and mobility sections of the Barthel index, and several nursing judgments . Results:In phase 1 five factors were independently associated with a higher risk of falls: fall as a presenting complaint (odds ratio 4.64 (95% confidence interval 2.59 to 8.33); a transfer and mobility score of 3 or 4 (2.10 (1.22 to 3.61)); and primary nurses' judgment that a patient was agitated (20.9 (9.62 to 45.62)), needed frequent toileting (2.48 (1.08 to 5.70)), and was visually impaired (3.56 (1.26 to 10.05 )). A risk assessment score (range 0-5) was derived by scoring one poi nt for each of these five factors. In phases 2 and 3 a risk assessment score >2 was used to define high risk: the sensitivity and specificit y of the score to predict falls during the following week was 93% and 88% respectively in phase 2 and 92% and 68% respectively in phase 3. C onclusion: This simple risk assessment tool predicted with clinically useful sensitivity and specificity a high percentage of falls among el derly hospital inpatients.