NEUROLOGIC OUTCOME WITH HEMORRHAGIC HYPOTENSION AFTER CLOSED-HEAD TRAUMA IN RATS - EFFECT OF EARLY VERSUS DELAYED CONSERVATIVE FLUID THERAPY

Citation
Z. Feldman et al., NEUROLOGIC OUTCOME WITH HEMORRHAGIC HYPOTENSION AFTER CLOSED-HEAD TRAUMA IN RATS - EFFECT OF EARLY VERSUS DELAYED CONSERVATIVE FLUID THERAPY, The journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 43(4), 1997, pp. 667-672
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
Volume
43
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
667 - 672
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
Objective: This study examined (1) whether two previously reported, we ll-established models in rats, one a model of hemorrhagic hypotension and the other a model of closed head trauma, could be combined to eval uate neurologic outcome when hemorrhage occurs subsequent to head inju ry, and (2) the ability of the traditional, conservative approach to f luid therapy (3 mL of intravenous fluid for 1 mL of blood loss) to rev erse the detrimental effects of hemorrhagic hypotension after closed h ead trauma, In addition, two strategies of fluid therapy (early and de layed) were examined. Methods: Fifty-six Sprague-Dawley male rats were divided into five groups with head injury at time 0 in groups 3 to 5, hemorrhage at 1 hour in groups 1, 2, 4, and 5, and intravenous fluid at 15 minutes (groups 2 and 5) or 60 minutes (groups 1 and 4) after he morrhage. Head injury was delivered using a weight-drop impact of 0.5 J onto the closed cranium, Neurologic Severity Score (NSS) was determi ned at 1 hour (just before hemorrhage) and at 4 hours. Results: NSS at 1 hour did not differ between groups 3 to 5 (15.5 (9-24) to 16 (2-21) , median (range)), The amount of bleeding did not differ between group s during the first 15 minutes of hemorrhage (2.8 +/- 0.8 to 3.7 +/- 2. 0 mL, mean +/- SD), After 60 minutes, cumulative blood loss in the del ayed fluid therapy groups was less (3.1 +/- 1.13 mL in group 1 and 4.2 5 +/- 2.39 mL in group 4) than in the early fluid therapy groups (7.73 +/- 4.41 mL in group 2 and 6.85 +/- 2.36 mL in group 5) (analysis of variance, p < 0.01), The NSS of group 3 (head injury only) improved at 4 hours after injury (12 (5-20)), whereas the NSS of groups 4 and 5 ( head injury followed by hemorrhage) deteriorated (24 (17-25) and 19.5 (9-25), respectively) (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.05). In all the hemo rrhage groups, fluid therapy failed to restore blood pressure to prehe morrhage levels. Conclusion: It is concluded that the two individual m odels of hemorrhagic hypotension and closed head trauma in rats can be combined to evaluate outcome when hemorrhage occurs subsequent to hea d injury, Furthermore, traditional, conservative fluid therapy, whethe r early or delayed, failed to restore blood pressure or to improve NSS when hemorrhage occurred after head injury, Blood loss was greater wi th early fluid therapy whether or not head injury was present.