This paper uses a Bayesian learning model to assess the respective inf
luence of different risk measurements on mortality risk perceptions. P
eople form risk beliefs using several sources of information, includin
g the actual population mean death risk level, the discounted lost lif
e expectancy, and the age-specific hazard rate considered by Benjamin
and Dougan (1997). The appropriate criterion for judging the validity
of risk perceptions is not the perfect information case, but rather wh
ether people form their risk beliefs in a rational manner given a worl
d of costly and limited risk information. Although the statistical res
ults support the overall conclusion that the learning process is ratio
nal, the character of the learning process differs depending on the ri
sk level. Risk-related variables are much better predictors of larger
risks than of small risks, which reflects the role of information cost
s and the benefits of learning about larger risks.