The merits of market and non-market, or social, housing provision are
often debated on the basis of entrenched conceptions of market and bur
eaucratic systems. From an economic perspective, this paper challenges
the validity of traditional 'polar' arguments in support of state or
market provision, concluding that there is no ex-ante case favouring o
ne system over the other. In either case, the critical factor in effic
ient production and management is the design of housing delivery syste
ms, encompassing issues such Its external efficiency pressures, intern
al incentive structures, controls over managerial discretion, and orga
nisational structure. The paper considers key aspects of system design
and concludes that appropriately configured not-for-profit producers
should be able to operate as efficiently and effectively as profit-mak
ing market providers and that they may have policy advantages in perio
ds of adjustment to excess demand for housing.