POTENTIAL ADVANTAGES OF PROTONS OVER CONVENTIONAL RADIATION BEAMS FORPARASPINAL TUMORS

Citation
U. Isacsson et al., POTENTIAL ADVANTAGES OF PROTONS OVER CONVENTIONAL RADIATION BEAMS FORPARASPINAL TUMORS, Radiotherapy and oncology, 45(1), 1997, pp. 63-70
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
01678140
Volume
45
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
63 - 70
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-8140(1997)45:1<63:PAOPOC>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Background and purpose: Conformal treatment planning with megavoltage X-rays and protons was studied in an attempt to determine if there are advantages of boost therapy with protons instead of X-rays for a pati ent with a tumour growing around the cervical spinal cord. Materials a nd methods: A patient with a Ewing sarcoma was selected for the model study. The proton boost plan was realised with a six beam patched tech nique. Several X-ray boost techniques were planned, some not yet pract ically realisable. The techniques giving the best dose distributions a nd the best tumour control probabilities in the absence of significant late toxicity were looked for. The boost techniques were added to two large lateral X-ray beams covering the planning target volume (PTV) a nd the main risk organ, the spinal cord. The evaluation was made with two biological models, i.e. the tumour control probability (TCP) model , proposed by Webb and Nahum (Webb, S. and Nahum, A.E. A model for cal culating tumour control probability in radiotherapy including the effe ct of inhomogeneous distributions of dose and clonogenic cell density. Phys. Med. Biol. 38: 653-666, 1993), and the normal tissue complicati on probability (NTCP) model, first derived by Lyman (Lyman, J.T. Compl ication probability as assessed from dose-volume histograms. Radiat. R es. 104: s13-s19, 1985). Results: The comparison showed small but clea r advantages of protons for the boost. At 1% NTCP in the spinal cord, the calculated TCP was on average 5% higher. However, depending on the values of the parameters chosen in the biological models, the gain fo r protons varied from 0-10%. The smallest gains were seen in radiosens itive tumours for which the TCP was close to 100% with any of the tech niques and in radioresistant tumours for which neither technique resul ted in any appreciable probability of local cure. Conclusion: Protons appear to have therapeutic advantages over conventional radiotherapy i n tumours with relatively high radiosensitivity situated close to the spinal cord. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.