Background and purpose: For endovascular HDR brachytherapy, very thin
sources are required and the dose is specified at a short distance to
the source centre down to 1.5 mm. The source which is used in the Nucl
etron HDR Selectron stepping source afterloader is treated by most dos
e calculation algorithms in clinical use as a point source, although i
ts dimensions are large compared to these dose specification distances
. Furthermore, inaccuracies might be introduced because consecutive dw
ell positions show an overlap of sources if the step size is smaller t
han the active length of the source. Materials and methods: In order t
o quantify these inaccuracies, we used the EGS4 Monte Carlo code to ge
nerate the dose distribution with 0.5 mm spatial resolution for a sing
le source. From this, translation and superposition were used to calcu
late dose distributions for multiple dwell positions. The results are
compared with those of other Monte Carlo computations and of a commerc
ial brachytherapy planning system. Results and conclusions: Our Monte
Carlo calculations showed that secondary electrons have no relevant in
fluence on the dose distribution and that errors up to 25% are made wh
en using the point source approximation for irradiations with a single
dwell position. However, when three or more dwell positions are used
with equal dwell times, the total error becomes negligibly small becau
se the errors from subsequent dwell positions compensate each other. A
t distances larger than 5 mm, there is a good match between the Monte
Carlo data and those of point source algorithms for all clinical relev
ant cases. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.