I examine the evolution of alternate genotypes that use two habitats t
hat differ in vegetative cover, focusing on the interplay between ecol
ogical dynamics of the community and changes in selective advantage. F
acultative habitat choice can stabilize a predator population that wou
ld cycle if isolated in the more open habitat. This has important impl
ications for the evolution of habitat use strategies. Local stability
arising from facultative habitat use allows any number of behavioural
genotypes to co-exist: selective use of the open habitat, selective us
e of the dense habitat, opportunistic use of both habitats in proporti
on to availability, and facultative switching between habitats to maxi
mize energy gain. Go-existence occurs because the fitness landscape is
hat at the ecological equilibrium imposed by the facultative genotype
. In contrast, ecological instability favours the evolution of genotyp
es with behavioural flexibility to avoid being in the wrong place at t
he wrong time or selective exploitation of one of the habitats. Uncert
ain information about habitat quality erodes the adaptive advantage of
otherwise 'optimal' behaviours, favouring a bet-hedging behavioural s
trategy synonymous with partial habitat preferences. These results sug
gest that ecological dynamics could have a strong influence on behavio
ural heterogeneity within forager populations and that a mixed ESS for
habitat use should predominate.