Electric utilities can reduce sulfur dioxide emissions through a varie
ty of strategies, and the cost of abatement can be minimized using tra
dable permits as under the Clean Air Pier Amendments of 1990. Previous
theoretical work has analyzed effects of public utility commission re
gulations on a utility's choice between permits and a single continuou
s ''abatement technology.'' Our numerical model considers discrete cho
ices among three abatement technologies. Using illustrative parameters
, we find that regulatory rules could more than double the cost of sul
fur dioxide compliance. They can even make costs with allowance tradin
g higher than coals with command and control regulation. (C) 1997 Acad
emic Press.