Lg. Portugal et al., OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE BREATHE-RIGHT DEVICE DURING EXERCISE IN ADULT MALES, American journal of rhinology, 11(5), 1997, pp. 393-397
In order to improve nasal breathing during competition, many athletes
recently have been wearing a spring-loaded, external nasal dilator ref
erred to as the Breathe-Right device (BRD). Although there are many su
bjective claims that this device improves breathing during exercise, t
here are currently no controlled studies documenting its efficacy. To
determine objectively whether the device improves the nasal airway, 20
subjects (10 Caucasian and 10 African-American) were studied during r
est and after 15 minutes of exercise using anterior rhinomanometry and
acoustic rhinometry to measure changes in airway resistance and minim
al cross-sectional area respectively. We found that the BRD exerts its
main effect in the region of the nasal valve improving the airway an
overall 21% in our group of subjects. This anatomic improvement in nas
al airway resulted in an overall 27% reduction in nasal resistance in
the Caucasian group. However, in the African-American group, a wider r
ange of resistance changes was observed with application of the BRD wi
th significant improvement in nasal resistance in some subjects but pa
radoxical worsening in others. In the African-American group as a whol
e, no significant change in nasal resistance occured with application
of the BRD. These measured differences are likely due to variations in
nasal anatomy that exist not only between races but also between indi
viduals within a given race. In addition, this study confirms the well
known decongestant effects of exercise providing anatomic data with a
coustic rhinometry not previously documented in the literature. Overal
l improvement in nasal airway seen with application of the BRD occured
independent of these exercise-related decongestant effects.