K. Kuhlmann, PRODUCT ECOBALANCE - A METHOD FOR COMPLET E ASSESSMENT OF, FOR EXAMPLE, BUILDING PRODUCTS MADE OF CEMENT AND CONCRETE, ZKG international. Edition B, 47(1), 1994, pp. 25-30
For some years government organizations. industry, and consumer and en
vironmental organizations have been working on methods with which, lik
e industrial management balances, the environmental burden resulting f
rom the manufacture of products are measured and assessed with the obj
ect of making products ecologically comparable. Balance models and ter
ms with widely differing factual content have been used such as ''ecob
alance'', ''product line analysis'' (PLA) or in the American language
sphere ''Product-Life-Cycle-Assessment''(LCA). The PLA is supposed to
combine and assess all the factors affecting the environment during th
e life of a product. The evaluation is intended to extent beyond the e
nvironmental sphere and also incorporate economic, social and communal
criteria. However no scheme has as yet been agreed for this. Both in
the LCA and in the ecobalance the life of the product is described fro
m raw material extraction to final disposal within an exactly defined
balance framework. On the input side are the consumption of energy, ra
w materials, water and air as well as the demands on land The output s
ide contains the airborne emissions. the noise immission. the waste ma
terial, waste water and waste heat, as well as useful raw materials pr
oduced The evaluation is to be confined to environmental demands, howe
ver it is only in some respects that it is simpler than that of the co
mplex PLA, as at present there is still no generally accepted ''ecolog
ical'' calculation unit. In the ecobalance for concrete various enviro
nmental units are standardized on the basis of the procedure used by t
he Federal Swiss Office for Environment, Forests and Agriculture, and
dimensionless proportional numbers are compiled on the basis of actual
and maximum possible loadings (limit values). The ecological loading
caused by the product is weighed against its benefit to the environmen
t in the form of a utility analysis. This decision technique familiar
mainly from planning processes makes it possible to include several po
ints of view at once arriving at a decision. Differing quantitative, a
nd also qualitative, data can be taken into account in the form of wei
ghted dimensionless utility values.