Jm. Schuster, THE ROLE OF DESIGN REVIEW IN AFFECTING THE QUALITY OF URBAN DESIGN - THE ARCHITECTS POINT-OF-VIEW, Journal of architectural and planning research, 14(3), 1997, pp. 209-225
In the United States, design review is the process by which private de
velopment proposals are presented for, and receive, independent, third
-party public interest scrutiny. These design review processes range f
rom citizen groups commenting on proposals in an ad hoc manner through
project-specific, citizens' advisory committees; to more formalized p
rocesses such as review by historic preservation commissions or city d
esign review boards. Thus, design review encompasses many of the ways
in which a public interest is taken into account and given some standi
ng in the design process. The practice of design review has been growi
ng throughout the country, but not without controversy. This paper rep
orts on the results of a research project undertaken by the Design and
Development Group at M.I.T in collaboration with the Boston Society o
f Architects and the American Institute of Architects. The centerpiece
of this project is a survey of Massachusetts architects assessing the
ir views of the practice of design review. The survey measures the ext
ent of architects' experiences with design review (extensive), the deg
ree with which architects view design review favorably or unfavorably
(overwhelmingly favorable), and the extent to which they agree or disa
gree with the various claims that have been made concerning design rev
iew. The paper summarizes a wide variety of analyses that have been co
mpleted with the survey data.