In the 1980s, the practice of converting campaign contributions into p
ersonal income on retirement was curtailed by the Federal Elections Co
mmission (FEC), but an exemption allowed some representatives to conti
nue this practice. Consequently, a natural experiment was created in w
hich congressional candidates faced different sets of rules. By identi
fying candidates who could keep excess campaign funds, the authors wer
e able to empirically measure the relevance of wealth maximization in
political campaign decisions. The evidence of the 1980s suggests that
candidates are concerned with more than simply winning elections. Spec
ifically, candidates who qualified for the FEC's exemption raised more
money and spent smaller portions of those contributions on their camp
aigns. This results in a sizable lump-sum transfer payment on retireme
nt.