During the past decade, research methodology in the area of child and
adult violence has increasingly utilized a clinical interview methodol
ogy. Although this methodology promises a more reliable and clinically
rich set of data, it also carries higher degree of risk of emotional
distress to the interview participants. Thus far, most of the focus on
risk has been directed toward the respondent or subject; however this
article describes differing aspects of risk for the interviewer and p
resents clinical examples. Approaches to minimizing and managing emoti
onal distress on the part of the interviewer are presented, with an em
phasis on recruitment of research personnel, initial and ongoing train
ing, and structuring regular interviewer team meetings. It is proposed
that the safety and emotional health of both the respondent and the i
nterviewer should always take priority over data collection.